Monday, December 2, 2013

Returning to a Palestine transformed: An interview with Palestinian activist, Jameela Jubran


Dear friends, 
please find below an interview published by Red Flag with my good friend, Jameela Jubran, a Palestinian activist who recently returned to her homeland, visiting Palestine for the first time in 33 years.  It is a moving account of her visit, as well as informative and inspiring. 

In solidarity, Kim

**

Returning to a Palestine transformed
an Interview with Palestinian activist, Jameela Jubran
by Corey Oakley: Red Flag: 25 November 2013

Returning to a Palestine transformed


Occupied Hebron: wire protects Palestinians from the refuse thrown from above by Israeli settlers.
Jameela Jubran had not set foot in Palestine for 33 years. But the death of her father last year, and a desire to see the truth about the Israeli occupation, drove her to return to her homeland. What she found, alongside the horror of Israeli occupation, was an inspiring new union movement. Red Flag’s Corey Oakley talked to her about the experience.
The most iconic images of the Palestinian resistance are those of fire and fury. The mass demonstrations, the armed fighters and most of all the kaffiyah-clad young people staring down Israeli tanks with nothing but rubble from the street. 
But there is another side to the resistance. A quiet, enduring defiance; a refusal to relinquish hope, identity and dignity in spite of all the years of dispossession. The grandmothers who still hold the keys to the home they were evicted from so many decades ago. The children who have never seen their homeland, but proudly assert “I am a Palestinian”.
It is this element of the Palestinian struggle I am reminded of when Jameela tells me how she took a clump of dirt from her father’s grave in Florida, all the way back to her family town Beit Sahour, near Bethlehem.
“It is a saddening thing for me to remember that he was buried in America, away from Palestine, the land that he loved, and that he instilled love for in us”, she says. “I felt like I wanted to do something symbolic to unite him with the land. So I asked my daughter to bring some soil from his grave in America, and I took it with me. She brought it from America to Australia, I took it from Australia to Jordan, and from Jordan I crossed the bridge and took it with me to Palestine, and I sprinkled the soil on the graves of my grandparents, his own mum and dad.
“I know he is not there, but every minute I was walking around in Palestine, often I would have tears in my eyes, saying to myself, ‘Baba, I am doing this for you, seeing this for you’.”
The Palestine of today is very different to what Jameela remembers. In 1980 there was, as now, an occupation. But it was possible to move relatively freely around the occupied territories, to travel from the West Bank to Gaza, and even into Israel itself – “Palestine of ’48”, as Jameela calls it.
Today the West Bank has been so broken up by checkpoints, Jewish-only settlements and segregated roads that any semblance of normal life is impossible. Journeys that once took 10 minutes can now take hours. Travelling from one part of town to another can mean negotiating numerous Israeli checkpoints.
Ghost Town’
Of all the places Jameela visited, Hebron was the “the saddest place”. Hebron is the only Palestinian city in the West Bank with a Jewish settlement in its centre. Four thousand Israeli soldiers severely restrict the movement of tens of thousands of Palestinian residents, all in order to defend 400 settlers who have taken over the heart of the city.
“The old city is known now as ‘Ghost Town’”, Jameela says. “It is just like a military zone. To make room for these 400 settlers, they evacuated 1,800 shops and the houses above them.  The shops are closed by metal gates, which are welded shut, so the owners cannot come back.”
Forty-two percent of the apartments in central Hebron have been abandoned by their occupants. For those who remain, it is a terrifying existence. Raja`a Abu `Ayesha, one of those who stayed, says, “Our house is like a cage. It is completely fenced in, including the entrance. My grandfather set it up that way to protect us, after settlers broke all our windows. Our house looks like an island surrounded by a sea of settlers, soldiers and a violent atmosphere.”
Shuhada Street, the once bustling centre of the old city, is deserted. Palestinians are not allowed to enter. With an Australian passport, Jameela could have walked down the street. “Mohammad, who was showing us around, told us, ‘You can walk if you want – I cannot walk.’ We thought to ourselves: ‘No. Mohammad, who lives inside the old city of Hebron, cannot walk this street. So we are not walking it.’”
Among the most sickening indicators of the attitude of the settlers are the rubbish-filled wire nets (see photo) that string above the narrow streets, below the houses now occupied by settlers. Jameela explains, “As people walked down the street they kept having rubbish thrown at them by the settlers – nappies, old rubbish, empty milk bottles, other bottles, anything.
“It was disgusting. So the NGOs, along with pro-Palestine activists, they helped the Palestinian residents build wire netting above the street. So now you as you walk down the street you see the rubbish trapped above people’s heads in the narrow passage leading up to the mosque.”
This is the everyday contempt that the heroes of “civilised” Israel display to the people whose land they occupy.
It is difficult to speak out openly, and not just because of the Israelis. Jameela tells me about the reaction when she challenged a Palestinian policeman on a bus about their role in enforcing the occupation.  “I looked at people around me, the Palestinians, and they were looking at me and mouthing ‘Shut up, shut up’, and putting their hands across their mouths.
“They are terrorised by the Palestinian police, who are terrorised by the Israelis. The Palestinian Authority is intimidating its own people into silence. People cannot speak their mind – I was only able to because I have an Australian passport.”
But in spite of everything, the resistance does continue. There are many popular committees and local groups organising across the villages and towns of the West Bank. Some of the most visible – and the most independent from the Palestinian Authority – have been the protest movements against the Apartheid Wall in Bi’lin and other villages. But there are also signs that a new workers’ movement is emerging.
The centre of this movement is Tulkarem, a city in the north-west of the West Bank. “Tulkarem embodies all the suffering of the Palestinians”, Jameela says. “Right on the wall. It is choked not only by the wall, but by the Israeli factories, which were established in the early 1980s.”
Six-month strike
Tulkarem is in Area C, one of the parts of the West Bank completely controlled by Israel. Some Israeli capitalists find it cheaper and easier to build their factories there.
“Each factory acts as a settlement”, Jameela explains. “Confiscating land and terrorising the people by terrorising their health.”
These factories produce all kinds of potentially harmful materials. Chemical fertilisers, plastics, polish, paints.
 One of the most notorious factories is Sol Or. Although it employs only 90 workers, three have recently died of cancer, almost certainly attributable to the poisonous bromine gas produced there, and the appalling health and safety conditions. Several other workers have died from burns.
The Israeli capitalists who built factories there did so because they could evade Israeli taxes and pay workers the absolute minimum – 50 shekels (about A$15) a day, which is way below the poverty line.
But this year the situation has been transformed. Jameela recounts: “The workers organised to take strike action – they went out for six months. The strike continued until the company broke down completely, and the new management had to negotiate with the workers and give them their health conditions, their back pay and everything else.
“The ripple effect of this strike was enormous. Six other factories wanted to strike, but their owners told them, ‘Don’t strike, we will give you everything you want.’”
A key part of the strikes’ success was the role played by a new union organisation, the Palestine New Federation of Trade Unions.
“They are completely independent from the Palestinian Authority”, Jameela says. “Some of the delegates are either former members of leftist organisations or still members. One activist in the union is on the central committee of the Palestine People’s Party. But, he told me, he refuses to impose the agenda of certain organisations over defending workers’ rights.”
This is an important positive in a context where the Palestinian left has often acted as a loyal opposition to Fatah, the main grouping in the PA, and most of the other unions are under the influence of the PA. “People started to want something else”, Jameela explains. “Because of their independent stance, these unions have gained a following, especially after these big strikes. Now they have 5,000 members.”
This new movement is still in its early stages. But it provides a glimmer of hope for the future. I asked Jameela how confident she was that a new mass movement would erupt in the territories – the much hoped for third intifada.
She told me the response she received when she asked the same question of activists and union organisers in the West Bank. “It is not a question of if. It is a question of when.”
- See more at: http://redflag.org.au/article/returning-palestine-transformed#sthash.XOmCHIVf.dpuf

Occupied Hebron: wire protects Palestinians from the refuse thrown from above by Israeli settlers.
Occupied Hebron: wire protects Palestinians from the refuse thrown from above by Israeli settlers. - See more at: http://redflag.org.au/article/returning-palestine-transformed#sthash.XOmCHIVf.dpuf
Occupied Hebron: wire protects Palestinians from the refuse thrown from above by Israeli settlers. - See more at: http://redflag.org.au/article/returning-palestine-transformed#sthash.XOmCHIVf.dpuf
Jameela Jubran had not set foot in Palestine for 33 years. But the death of her father last year, and a desire to see the truth about the Israeli occupation, drove her to return to her homeland. What she found, alongside the horror of Israeli occupation, was an inspiring new union movement. Red Flag’s Corey Oakley talked to her about the experience.
The most iconic images of the Palestinian resistance are those of fire and fury. The mass demonstrations, the armed fighters and most of all the kaffiyah-clad young people staring down Israeli tanks with nothing but rubble from the street.
But there is another side to the resistance. A quiet, enduring defiance; a refusal to relinquish hope, identity and dignity in spite of all the years of dispossession. The grandmothers who still hold the keys to the home they were evicted from so many decades ago. The children who have never seen their homeland, but proudly assert “I am a Palestinian”.
It is this element of the Palestinian struggle I am reminded of when Jameela tells me how she took a clump of dirt from her father’s grave in Florida, all the way back to her family town Beit Sahour, near Bethlehem.
“It is a saddening thing for me to remember that he was buried in America, away from Palestine, the land that he loved, and that he instilled love for in us”, she says. “I felt like I wanted to do something symbolic to unite him with the land. So I asked my daughter to bring some soil from his grave in America, and I took it with me. She brought it from America to Australia, I took it from Australia to Jordan, and from Jordan I crossed the bridge and took it with me to Palestine, and I sprinkled the soil on the graves of my grandparents, his own mum and dad.
“I know he is not there, but every minute I was walking around in Palestine, often I would have tears in my eyes, saying to myself, ‘Baba, I am doing this for you, seeing this for you’.”
The Palestine of today is very different to what Jameela remembers. In 1980 there was, as now, an occupation. But it was possible to move relatively freely around the occupied territories, to travel from the West Bank to Gaza, and even into Israel itself – “Palestine of ’48”, as Jameela calls it.
Today the West Bank has been so broken up by checkpoints, Jewish-only settlements and segregated roads that any semblance of normal life is impossible. Journeys that once took 10 minutes can now take hours. Travelling from one part of town to another can mean negotiating numerous Israeli checkpoints.
Ghost Town’
Of all the places Jameela visited, Hebron was the “the saddest place”. Hebron is the only Palestinian city in the West Bank with a Jewish settlement in its centre. Four thousand Israeli soldiers severely restrict the movement of tens of thousands of Palestinian residents, all in order to defend 400 settlers who have taken over the heart of the city.
“The old city is known now as ‘Ghost Town’”, Jameela says. “It is just like a military zone. To make room for these 400 settlers, they evacuated 1,800 shops and the houses above them.  The shops are closed by metal gates, which are welded shut, so the owners cannot come back.”
Forty-two percent of the apartments in central Hebron have been abandoned by their occupants. For those who remain, it is a terrifying existence. Raja`a Abu `Ayesha, one of those who stayed, says, “Our house is like a cage. It is completely fenced in, including the entrance. My grandfather set it up that way to protect us, after settlers broke all our windows. Our house looks like an island surrounded by a sea of settlers, soldiers and a violent atmosphere.”
Shuhada Street, the once bustling centre of the old city, is deserted. Palestinians are not allowed to enter. With an Australian passport, Jameela could have walked down the street. “Mohammad, who was showing us around, told us, ‘You can walk if you want – I cannot walk.’ We thought to ourselves: ‘No. Mohammad, who lives inside the old city of Hebron, cannot walk this street. So we are not walking it.’”
Among the most sickening indicators of the attitude of the settlers are the rubbish-filled wire nets (see photo) that string above the narrow streets, below the houses now occupied by settlers. Jameela explains, “As people walked down the street they kept having rubbish thrown at them by the settlers – nappies, old rubbish, empty milk bottles, other bottles, anything.
“It was disgusting. So the NGOs, along with pro-Palestine activists, they helped the Palestinian residents build wire netting above the street. So now you as you walk down the street you see the rubbish trapped above people’s heads in the narrow passage leading up to the mosque.”
This is the everyday contempt that the heroes of “civilised” Israel display to the people whose land they occupy.
It is difficult to speak out openly, and not just because of the Israelis. Jameela tells me about the reaction when she challenged a Palestinian policeman on a bus about their role in enforcing the occupation.  “I looked at people around me, the Palestinians, and they were looking at me and mouthing ‘Shut up, shut up’, and putting their hands across their mouths.
“They are terrorised by the Palestinian police, who are terrorised by the Israelis. The Palestinian Authority is intimidating its own people into silence. People cannot speak their mind – I was only able to because I have an Australian passport.”
But in spite of everything, the resistance does continue. There are many popular committees and local groups organising across the villages and towns of the West Bank. Some of the most visible – and the most independent from the Palestinian Authority – have been the protest movements against the Apartheid Wall in Bi’lin and other villages. But there are also signs that a new workers’ movement is emerging.
The centre of this movement is Tulkarem, a city in the north-west of the West Bank. “Tulkarem embodies all the suffering of the Palestinians”, Jameela says. “Right on the wall. It is choked not only by the wall, but by the Israeli factories, which were established in the early 1980s.”
Six-month strike
Tulkarem is in Area C, one of the parts of the West Bank completely controlled by Israel. Some Israeli capitalists find it cheaper and easier to build their factories there.
“Each factory acts as a settlement”, Jameela explains. “Confiscating land and terrorising the people by terrorising their health.”
These factories produce all kinds of potentially harmful materials. Chemical fertilisers, plastics, polish, paints.
 One of the most notorious factories is Sol Or. Although it employs only 90 workers, three have recently died of cancer, almost certainly attributable to the poisonous bromine gas produced there, and the appalling health and safety conditions. Several other workers have died from burns.
The Israeli capitalists who built factories there did so because they could evade Israeli taxes and pay workers the absolute minimum – 50 shekels (about A$15) a day, which is way below the poverty line.
But this year the situation has been transformed. Jameela recounts: “The workers organised to take strike action – they went out for six months. The strike continued until the company broke down completely, and the new management had to negotiate with the workers and give them their health conditions, their back pay and everything else.
“The ripple effect of this strike was enormous. Six other factories wanted to strike, but their owners told them, ‘Don’t strike, we will give you everything you want.’”
A key part of the strikes’ success was the role played by a new union organisation, the Palestine New Federation of Trade Unions.
“They are completely independent from the Palestinian Authority”, Jameela says. “Some of the delegates are either former members of leftist organisations or still members. One activist in the union is on the central committee of the Palestine People’s Party. But, he told me, he refuses to impose the agenda of certain organisations over defending workers’ rights.”
This is an important positive in a context where the Palestinian left has often acted as a loyal opposition to Fatah, the main grouping in the PA, and most of the other unions are under the influence of the PA. “People started to want something else”, Jameela explains. “Because of their independent stance, these unions have gained a following, especially after these big strikes. Now they have 5,000 members.”
This new movement is still in its early stages. But it provides a glimmer of hope for the future. I asked Jameela how confident she was that a new mass movement would erupt in the territories – the much hoped for third intifada.
She told me the response she received when she asked the same question of activists and union organisers in the West Bank. “It is not a question of if. It is a question of when.”
- See more at: http://redflag.org.au/article/returning-palestine-transformed#sthash.XOmCHIVf.dpuf


Jameela Jubran had not set foot in Palestine for 33 years. But the death of her father last year, and a desire to see the truth about the Israeli occupation, drove her to return to her homeland. What she found, alongside the horror of Israeli occupation, was an inspiring new union movement. Red Flag’s Corey Oakley talked to her about the experience.

The most iconic images of the Palestinian resistance are those of fire and fury. The mass demonstrations, the armed fighters and most of all the kaffiyah-clad young people staring down Israeli tanks with nothing but rubble from the street. 

But there is another side to the resistance. A quiet, enduring defiance; a refusal to relinquish hope, identity and dignity in spite of all the years of dispossession. The grandmothers who still hold the keys to the home they were evicted from so many decades ago. The children who have never seen their homeland, but proudly assert “I am a Palestinian”.

It is this element of the Palestinian struggle I am reminded of when Jameela tells me how she took a clump of dirt from her father’s grave in Florida, all the way back to her family town Beit Sahour, near Bethlehem.

“It is a saddening thing for me to remember that he was buried in America, away from Palestine, the land that he loved, and that he instilled love for in us”, she says. “I felt like I wanted to do something symbolic to unite him with the land. So I asked my daughter to bring some soil from his grave in America, and I took it with me. She brought it from America to Australia, I took it from Australia to Jordan, and from Jordan I crossed the bridge and took it with me to Palestine, and I sprinkled the soil on the graves of my grandparents, his own mum and dad.

“I know he is not there, but every minute I was walking around in Palestine, often I would have tears in my eyes, saying to myself, ‘Baba, I am doing this for you, seeing this for you’.”
 
The Palestine of today is very different to what Jameela remembers. In 1980 there was, as now, an occupation. But it was possible to move relatively freely around the occupied territories, to travel from the West Bank to Gaza, and even into Israel itself – “Palestine of ’48”, as Jameela calls it.

Today the West Bank has been so broken up by checkpoints, Jewish-only settlements and segregated roads that any semblance of normal life is impossible. Journeys that once took 10 minutes can now take hours. Travelling from one part of town to another can mean negotiating numerous Israeli checkpoints.

‛Ghost Town’
Of all the places Jameela visited, Hebron was the “the saddest place”. Hebron is the only Palestinian city in the West Bank with a Jewish settlement in its centre. Four thousand Israeli soldiers severely restrict the movement of tens of thousands of Palestinian residents, all in order to defend 400 settlers who have taken over the heart of the city.

“The old city is known now as ‘Ghost Town’”, Jameela says. “It is just like a military zone. To make room for these 400 settlers, they evacuated 1,800 shops and the houses above them.  The shops are closed by metal gates, which are welded shut, so the owners cannot come back.”

Forty-two percent of the apartments in central Hebron have been abandoned by their occupants. For those who remain, it is a terrifying existence. Raja`a Abu `Ayesha, one of those who stayed, says, “Our house is like a cage. It is completely fenced in, including the entrance. My grandfather set it up that way to protect us, after settlers broke all our windows. Our house looks like an island surrounded by a sea of settlers, soldiers and a violent atmosphere.”

Shuhada Street, the once bustling centre of the old city, is deserted. Palestinians are not allowed to enter. With an Australian passport, Jameela could have walked down the street. “Mohammad, who was showing us around, told us, ‘You can walk if you want – I cannot walk.’ We thought to ourselves: ‘No. Mohammad, who lives inside the old city of Hebron, cannot walk this street. So we are not walking it.’”

Among the most sickening indicators of the attitude of the settlers are the rubbish-filled wire nets (see photo) that string above the narrow streets, below the houses now occupied by settlers. Jameela explains, “As people walked down the street they kept having rubbish thrown at them by the settlers – nappies, old rubbish, empty milk bottles, other bottles, anything.
“It was disgusting. So the NGOs, along with pro-Palestine activists, they helped the Palestinian residents build wire netting above the street. So now you as you walk down the street you see the rubbish trapped above people’s heads in the narrow passage leading up to the mosque.”
This is the everyday contempt that the heroes of “civilised” Israel display to the people whose land they occupy.

It is difficult to speak out openly, and not just because of the Israelis. Jameela tells me about the reaction when she challenged a Palestinian policeman on a bus about their role in enforcing the occupation.  “I looked at people around me, the Palestinians, and they were looking at me and mouthing ‘Shut up, shut up’, and putting their hands across their mouths.

“They are terrorised by the Palestinian police, who are terrorised by the Israelis. The Palestinian Authority is intimidating its own people into silence. People cannot speak their mind – I was only able to because I have an Australian passport.”

But in spite of everything, the resistance does continue. There are many popular committees and local groups organising across the villages and towns of the West Bank. Some of the most visible – and the most independent from the Palestinian Authority – have been the protest movements against the Apartheid Wall in Bi’lin and other villages. But there are also signs that a new workers’ movement is emerging.

The centre of this movement is Tulkarem, a city in the north-west of the West Bank. “Tulkarem embodies all the suffering of the Palestinians”, Jameela says. “Right on the wall. It is choked not only by the wall, but by the Israeli factories, which were established in the early 1980s.”

Six-month strike
Tulkarem is in Area C, one of the parts of the West Bank completely controlled by Israel. Some Israeli capitalists find it cheaper and easier to build their factories there.

“Each factory acts as a settlement”, Jameela explains. “Confiscating land and terrorising the people by terrorising their health.”

These factories produce all kinds of potentially harmful materials. Chemical fertilisers, plastics, polish, paints.

 One of the most notorious factories is Sol Or. Although it employs only 90 workers, three have recently died of cancer, almost certainly attributable to the poisonous bromine gas produced there, and the appalling health and safety conditions. Several other workers have died from burns.

The Israeli capitalists who built factories there did so because they could evade Israeli taxes and pay workers the absolute minimum – 50 shekels (about A$15) a day, which is way below the poverty line.

But this year the situation has been transformed. Jameela recounts: “The workers organised to take strike action – they went out for six months. The strike continued until the company broke down completely, and the new management had to negotiate with the workers and give them their health conditions, their back pay and everything else.

“The ripple effect of this strike was enormous. Six other factories wanted to strike, but their owners told them, ‘Don’t strike, we will give you everything you want.’”

A key part of the strikes’ success was the role played by a new union organisation, the Palestine New Federation of Trade Unions.

“They are completely independent from the Palestinian Authority”, Jameela says. “Some of the delegates are either former members of leftist organisations or still members. One activist in the union is on the central committee of the Palestine People’s Party. But, he told me, he refuses to impose the agenda of certain organisations over defending workers’ rights.”

This is an important positive in a context where the Palestinian left has often acted as a loyal opposition to Fatah, the main grouping in the PA, and most of the other unions are under the influence of the PA. “People started to want something else”, Jameela explains. “Because of their independent stance, these unions have gained a following, especially after these big strikes. Now they have 5,000 members.”

This new movement is still in its early stages. But it provides a glimmer of hope for the future. I asked Jameela how confident she was that a new mass movement would erupt in the territories – the much hoped for third intifada.

She told me the response she received when she asked the same question of activists and union organisers in the West Bank. “It is not a question of if. It is a question of when.”

Returning to a Palestine transformed


Occupied Hebron: wire protects Palestinians from the refuse thrown from above by Israeli settlers.
Jameela Jubran had not set foot in Palestine for 33 years. But the death of her father last year, and a desire to see the truth about the Israeli occupation, drove her to return to her homeland. What she found, alongside the horror of Israeli occupation, was an inspiring new union movement. Red Flag’s Corey Oakley talked to her about the experience.
The most iconic images of the Palestinian resistance are those of fire and fury. The mass demonstrations, the armed fighters and most of all the kaffiyah-clad young people staring down Israeli tanks with nothing but rubble from the street.
But there is another side to the resistance. A quiet, enduring defiance; a refusal to relinquish hope, identity and dignity in spite of all the years of dispossession. The grandmothers who still hold the keys to the home they were evicted from so many decades ago. The children who have never seen their homeland, but proudly assert “I am a Palestinian”.
It is this element of the Palestinian struggle I am reminded of when Jameela tells me how she took a clump of dirt from her father’s grave in Florida, all the way back to her family town Beit Sahour, near Bethlehem.
“It is a saddening thing for me to remember that he was buried in America, away from Palestine, the land that he loved, and that he instilled love for in us”, she says. “I felt like I wanted to do something symbolic to unite him with the land. So I asked my daughter to bring some soil from his grave in America, and I took it with me. She brought it from America to Australia, I took it from Australia to Jordan, and from Jordan I crossed the bridge and took it with me to Palestine, and I sprinkled the soil on the graves of my grandparents, his own mum and dad.
“I know he is not there, but every minute I was walking around in Palestine, often I would have tears in my eyes, saying to myself, ‘Baba, I am doing this for you, seeing this for you’.”
The Palestine of today is very different to what Jameela remembers. In 1980 there was, as now, an occupation. But it was possible to move relatively freely around the occupied territories, to travel from the West Bank to Gaza, and even into Israel itself – “Palestine of ’48”, as Jameela calls it.
Today the West Bank has been so broken up by checkpoints, Jewish-only settlements and segregated roads that any semblance of normal life is impossible. Journeys that once took 10 minutes can now take hours. Travelling from one part of town to another can mean negotiating numerous Israeli checkpoints.
Ghost Town’
Of all the places Jameela visited, Hebron was the “the saddest place”. Hebron is the only Palestinian city in the West Bank with a Jewish settlement in its centre. Four thousand Israeli soldiers severely restrict the movement of tens of thousands of Palestinian residents, all in order to defend 400 settlers who have taken over the heart of the city.
“The old city is known now as ‘Ghost Town’”, Jameela says. “It is just like a military zone. To make room for these 400 settlers, they evacuated 1,800 shops and the houses above them.  The shops are closed by metal gates, which are welded shut, so the owners cannot come back.”
Forty-two percent of the apartments in central Hebron have been abandoned by their occupants. For those who remain, it is a terrifying existence. Raja`a Abu `Ayesha, one of those who stayed, says, “Our house is like a cage. It is completely fenced in, including the entrance. My grandfather set it up that way to protect us, after settlers broke all our windows. Our house looks like an island surrounded by a sea of settlers, soldiers and a violent atmosphere.”
Shuhada Street, the once bustling centre of the old city, is deserted. Palestinians are not allowed to enter. With an Australian passport, Jameela could have walked down the street. “Mohammad, who was showing us around, told us, ‘You can walk if you want – I cannot walk.’ We thought to ourselves: ‘No. Mohammad, who lives inside the old city of Hebron, cannot walk this street. So we are not walking it.’”
Among the most sickening indicators of the attitude of the settlers are the rubbish-filled wire nets (see photo) that string above the narrow streets, below the houses now occupied by settlers. Jameela explains, “As people walked down the street they kept having rubbish thrown at them by the settlers – nappies, old rubbish, empty milk bottles, other bottles, anything.
“It was disgusting. So the NGOs, along with pro-Palestine activists, they helped the Palestinian residents build wire netting above the street. So now you as you walk down the street you see the rubbish trapped above people’s heads in the narrow passage leading up to the mosque.”
This is the everyday contempt that the heroes of “civilised” Israel display to the people whose land they occupy.
It is difficult to speak out openly, and not just because of the Israelis. Jameela tells me about the reaction when she challenged a Palestinian policeman on a bus about their role in enforcing the occupation.  “I looked at people around me, the Palestinians, and they were looking at me and mouthing ‘Shut up, shut up’, and putting their hands across their mouths.
“They are terrorised by the Palestinian police, who are terrorised by the Israelis. The Palestinian Authority is intimidating its own people into silence. People cannot speak their mind – I was only able to because I have an Australian passport.”
But in spite of everything, the resistance does continue. There are many popular committees and local groups organising across the villages and towns of the West Bank. Some of the most visible – and the most independent from the Palestinian Authority – have been the protest movements against the Apartheid Wall in Bi’lin and other villages. But there are also signs that a new workers’ movement is emerging.
The centre of this movement is Tulkarem, a city in the north-west of the West Bank. “Tulkarem embodies all the suffering of the Palestinians”, Jameela says. “Right on the wall. It is choked not only by the wall, but by the Israeli factories, which were established in the early 1980s.”
Six-month strike
Tulkarem is in Area C, one of the parts of the West Bank completely controlled by Israel. Some Israeli capitalists find it cheaper and easier to build their factories there.
“Each factory acts as a settlement”, Jameela explains. “Confiscating land and terrorising the people by terrorising their health.”
These factories produce all kinds of potentially harmful materials. Chemical fertilisers, plastics, polish, paints.
 One of the most notorious factories is Sol Or. Although it employs only 90 workers, three have recently died of cancer, almost certainly attributable to the poisonous bromine gas produced there, and the appalling health and safety conditions. Several other workers have died from burns.
The Israeli capitalists who built factories there did so because they could evade Israeli taxes and pay workers the absolute minimum – 50 shekels (about A$15) a day, which is way below the poverty line.
But this year the situation has been transformed. Jameela recounts: “The workers organised to take strike action – they went out for six months. The strike continued until the company broke down completely, and the new management had to negotiate with the workers and give them their health conditions, their back pay and everything else.
“The ripple effect of this strike was enormous. Six other factories wanted to strike, but their owners told them, ‘Don’t strike, we will give you everything you want.’”
A key part of the strikes’ success was the role played by a new union organisation, the Palestine New Federation of Trade Unions.
“They are completely independent from the Palestinian Authority”, Jameela says. “Some of the delegates are either former members of leftist organisations or still members. One activist in the union is on the central committee of the Palestine People’s Party. But, he told me, he refuses to impose the agenda of certain organisations over defending workers’ rights.”
This is an important positive in a context where the Palestinian left has often acted as a loyal opposition to Fatah, the main grouping in the PA, and most of the other unions are under the influence of the PA. “People started to want something else”, Jameela explains. “Because of their independent stance, these unions have gained a following, especially after these big strikes. Now they have 5,000 members.”
This new movement is still in its early stages. But it provides a glimmer of hope for the future. I asked Jameela how confident she was that a new mass movement would erupt in the territories – the much hoped for third intifada.
She told me the response she received when she asked the same question of activists and union organisers in the West Bank. “It is not a question of if. It is a question of when.”
- See more at: http://redflag.org.au/article/returning-palestine-transformed#sthash.XOmCHIVf.dpuf

Sunday, December 1, 2013

Activestills Photo story: Day of Rage against the Prawer-Begin Plan


Dear friends,
as you will be aware on Saturday protest took place inside the Zionist state, the Occupied West Bank and across the world in opposition to Israel's Prawer-Begin Plan.  The Prawer-Begin Plan is the biggest Zionist land grab since 1948.  The plan if fully implement will result in the destruction of more than 35 Palestinian Bedouin villages and the ethnic cleansing of up to 70,000 Palestinian Bedouin from their traditional lands.

Activestills, a collective of activist photographers covered the protests inside Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories.  They have now published a collective photo story board of the protests.  I have included below just a small sample of their amazing photos, along with the blurb they have written for them. 

You can check out their FULL photo story of the protests by clicking here.

in solidarity,
Kim

**

Day of Rage against the Prawer-Begin Plan

In protest of the Prawer-Begin Plan, which if implemented, will result in the forced displacement of tens of thousands of Bedouin in the Negev desert, Bedouin and other activists organized a 'day of rage.' On Saturday November 30, demonstrations took place in the southern town of Hura, in Haifa, East Jerusalem, Ramallah and Jaffa. The following is the story of those protests, in photos.
|
Photos: Yotam Ronen, Oren Ziv, Ryan Rodrick Beiler, Keren Manor, Mareike Lauken, Tali Mayer, Shiraz Grinbaum
Editing: Mareike Lauken

  • Protest against Prawer plan, Hura, Israel, 30.11.2013

     

        
  • Demonstration against the Prawer Plan, Haifa, Israel, 30.11.2013



      • Day of Rage against the Prawer-Begin Plan, Al Jalazun, West Bank, 30.11.2013

       
      • Day of Rage against Prawer-Begin Plan, Jaffa, 30.11.2013

      Friday, November 29, 2013

      Photos: Melbourne Against the Prawer Plan

      The Coalition Against Israeli Apartheid (Melbourne) opposes Israel's Prawer plan and supports the Prawer Won't Pass call to action. 

      Visit CAIA Melbourne on Facebook: (click here)
      Visit CAIA Melbourne's website (click here)

      Stop Prawer Call to Action: 

      DAY OF RAGE, 30 NOVEMBER 2013 #StopPrawerPlan

      On 24th of June, the Israeli Knesset approved the Prawer-Begin plan, which if implemented will result in the destruction of more than 35 unrecognized villages in Al-Naqab and the forced expulsion and confinement of more than 70,000 Palestinian Bedouins. The Prawer plan is the largest Israeli land-grab since 1948. It epitomizes the nature of Israel’s policy; Israeli-Jewish demographic expansion and Palestinian-Arab demographic containment.


      The International community has repeatedly called on Israel to halt the implementation of the Prawer Plan due to its discriminatory nature and the severe infringement it causes on the rights of Palestinian Bedouins in Al-Naqab. The UN committee on the elimination of Racial Discrimination called on Israel to withdraw the proposed legislation of the Prawer Plan. Also, in 2012, the European Parliament passed a resolution calling on Israel to stop the Prawer plan and its policies of forced displacement and dispossession.


      Injustice, humiliation and forced displacement are a recurring theme in Palestine’s history. This is lesson that we as a group of youth take to the heart. We will oppose, resist and work against the continuous assault that our communities, across Palestine face. Therefore, we launched the “Prawer will not pass” campaign with an eye to preventing this plan to be yet another chapter in Palestine’s long and tragic history.


      Opposing the Prawer Plan is to oppose ethnic cleansing, displacement and confinement in the 21st century. 


      Join us by organizing marches, protests, sending letters to those with positions of influence in your country or community, by doing whatever you can, in order to force Israel to stop the Prawer plan.


      Join us on the 30th of Nov. in saying “Prawer shall not Pass”.
      For more information, please contact us on: Facebook: (click here)














       








      Monday, November 25, 2013

      Why the Palestinians don’t have a partner for peace

      Dear friends,
      please find below my latest article published by RED FLAG, which discusses why the "peace process" is a farce and why the Palestinians have no partner for peace.

      The article is particularly timely given the Australian Abbott government's secretive change of position on Palestine and Israel's illegal colonies in the Occupied Territories at the UN - a change of position which they failed to announce to the Australian public. 

      Australia is now one of eight nations to abstain on
      a United Nations general assembly resolution which called for an end to  illegal Israeli colonies in the occupied Palestinian territories.  While Australia abstained, 158 countries voted in favour of the UN resolution, which called for the "prevention of all acts of violence, destruction, harassment and provocation by Israeli settlers".

      Australia also abstained on another draft resolution, which demanded that Israel accept the requirements of the Geneva conventions, and "comply scrupulously" with relevant provisions.  On this resolution, 160 were in favour, six against, Australia abstained.

      According to Julia Bishop, Australia's Foreign Minister,
      the secret shift in policy is justified and support for Israel's illegal colonies is "balanced".  No doubt, we will hear pronouncements from Bishop and her Ministry of Truth soon that war is peace, freedom is slavery and ignorance is strength. (for more information, you can read more on Australia's secret policy change here, here and here)

      As noted in my article, because the Palestinians have no partner for peace, Palestinian civil society in 2005 launched the non-violent Boycott Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel.  Now more than ever, in light of both the failed peace process and Bishop's Orwellian logic and the Abbott govenment's support for Israel's illegal colonies, it is time support the Palestinian BDS campaign  (for more information click here)


       in solidarity, Kim 

      **

      Why the Palestinians don’t have a partner for peace

      US Secretary of State John Kerry in early November chaired the latest round of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. His visit to the region was downbeat, highlighting once again the failure of the US-backed “peace process”.
      Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu predictably blamed the failure of the negotiations squarely on the Palestinians. “[The] pressure has to be put where it belongs: that is on the Palestinians, who refuse to budge”, he told Kerry. Israel, its prime minister insists, does not have a partner for peace.
      Netanyahu’s argument is not new. Similar claims have been made repeatedly by Zionist leaders – both before and after the creation of Israel. In 1923 Ze’ev Jabotinsky, in his essay “The iron wall”, acknowledged that Palestinians would never give up their homeland willingly:
      “Any native people – it’s all the same whether they are civilised or savage – views their country as their national home, of which they will always be the complete masters. They will not voluntarily allow, not only a new master, but even a new partner.” Therefore, argued Jabotinsky, peace was dependent “not on our relationship with the Arabs, but exclusively on the Arabs’ relationship to Zionism”.
      In the absence of Palestinian capitulation and “peace” on Zionist terms, it was necessary, he argued, to create an “iron wall [of bayonets] which the native population cannot break through”.
      This view of “peace” and what to do in its absence has been the mainstay of Israel policy since 1948. The claim that the Zionist state had no partner for peace became further entrenched in the Zionist narrative in the wake of the failed Camp David Summit in 2000. At the time, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak claimed that Israel had made a “generous” and “unprecedented” offer that had been rejected by Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.
      However in a wide-ranging 2003 interview in Israel’s largest circulating Hebrew newspaper, Yediot Aharonot, Barak admitted that the so-called “generous” offer was a lie. “I did not give away a thing”, he boasted.
      Major concessions
      This was reaffirmed in 2011, when some 1,700 documents relating to the “peace process” between 1999 and 2010 were leaked. The documents, belonging to the office of the chief Palestinian negotiator, Sa’eb Erekat, revealed that the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) had been willing to make extensive demographic and territorial concessions to Israel.
      Not only had PA/PLO negotiators been willing to accept the annexation of all but one of Israel’s illegal colonies in occupied Jerusalem, they were also prepared to allow the annexation of parts of Palestinian neighbourhoods in occupied East Jerusalem.
      The Palestine Papers also revealed that the Palestinian negotiators were prepared to allow “flexibility” in regard to Haram al-Sharif (the third holiest Muslim site in the world) and had been willing to negotiate away the right of return for the majority of the 6 million Palestinian refugees living in exile, while also acceding to Zionist demands that Israel be explicitly recognised as a Jewish state.
      When these revelations became public, the PLO and the PA were widely condemned by Palestinians. However, the Palestine Papers also revealed Israel’s rejectionism. Even when the Palestinian negotiators were prepared to give what Erakat termed “the biggest Yerushalayim [Jerusalem] in history” and to accede to the majority of Israel’s demands, including surrendering Palestinian rights enshrined in international law, it had not been enough for the leaders of the Zionist state.
      Despite these unprecedented concessions, Israel would agree to “peace” with the Palestinians only if they capitulated to every Israeli demand, accepted all Zionists goals and foreswore the establishment of a viable Palestinian state.
      Illegal construction continues
      The lack of an Israeli peace partner was again amply highlighted during Kerry’s recent visit, when Israel announced it would build 5,000 new Jewish only residences in occupied East Jerusalem and 20,000 new Jewish only residences in illegal colonies in the occupied West Bank.
      In a 7 November interview with Israel’s Channel 2, Kerry was forced to admonish Netanyahu: “How – if you say you’re working for peace and you want peace and a Palestine … that belongs to the people who live there – how can you say ‘We’re planning to build in the place that will eventually be Palestine?’ … it sends a message that somehow perhaps you’re not really serious.”
      Israel’s lip-service to the peace process should come as no surprise. Today, more than half a million Israeli settlers reside illegally in the West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem – double the figure of 241,500 prior to the Oslo agreement in 1993.
      While Israel continues its widespread colonisation in occupied East Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank, it has also announced plans to ethnically cleanse more than 40,000 Palestinian Bedouins, who are Israeli citizens, from more than 40 villages in the Negev desert in southern Israel.
      Gaza under siege
      Israel’s actions in Gaza over the last seven years have also revealed that it has little interest in ending the conflict with the Palestinians. Since 2006, Israel has imposed a brutal blockade on the 1.6 million people living in Gaza. The coastal strip was transformed into the world’s largest open air prison. This siege is illegal; collectively punishing a civilian population is a war crime under international law.
      According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Israel’s blockade has now resulted in 44 percent of Gaza’s population (more than 700,000 people) suffering from food insecurity, while 80 percent (just under 1.3 million people) are dependent on donor aid.
      This month, Gaza’s Ministry of Health warned that the territory was on the brink of a “health catastrophe”. Not only is there a severe shortage of vital medicines; there is also a fuel shortage that threatens the 13 hospitals and 54 primary health care centres in the Gaza Strip. Since 2006, when Israeli bombing destroyed much of Gaza’s public infrastructure, including the only electricity plant, Gaza’s population, hospitals and essential services have been subject to frequent and lengthy power cuts.
      Palestinian hospitals and other essential services have been forced to rely on emergency generators to power life-saving equipment, as well as intensive care units and neonatal units. The fuel shortage also impacts greatly on the ability to dispatch emergency outreach services and ambulances to those in need.
      From its inception, the so-called “peace process” was doomed to failure because the Zionist state is not interested in reaching even a limited peace settlement with the Palestinians, let alone a just one. Israel’s actions over the last 20 years have confirmed that it plans to continue its apartheid and occupation policies, as well as ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.
      It is because Israel has demonstrated that it has no interest in peace that Palestinian civil society in 2005 launched the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign, calling on all people of conscience to support the non-violent campaign until Israel meets its obligation to recognise the Palestinian people’s inalienable right to self-determination and fully complies with international law.
      - See more at: http://redflag.org.au/article/why-palestinians-don%E2%80%99t-have-partner-peace#sthash.Gr16b33j.dpuf

      Why the Palestinians don’t have a partner for peace


      Kim Bullimore | REDFLAG: 25-Nov-2013



      US Secretary of State John Kerry in early November chaired the latest round of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. His visit to the region was downbeat, highlighting once again the failure of the US-backed “peace process”.

      Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu predictably blamed the failure of the negotiations squarely on the Palestinians. “[The] pressure has to be put where it belongs: that is on the Palestinians, who refuse to budge”, he told Kerry. Israel, its prime minister insists, does not have a partner for peace.

      Netanyahu’s argument is not new. Similar claims have been made repeatedly by Zionist leaders – both before and after the creation of Israel. In 1923 Ze’ev Jabotinsky, in his essay “The iron wall”, acknowledged that Palestinians would never give up their homeland willingly:
      “Any native people – it’s all the same whether they are civilised or savage – views their country as their national home, of which they will always be the complete masters. They will not voluntarily allow, not only a new master, but even a new partner.” Therefore, argued Jabotinsky, peace was dependent “not on our relationship with the Arabs, but exclusively on the Arabs’ relationship to Zionism”.

      In the absence of Palestinian capitulation and “peace” on Zionist terms, it was necessary, he argued, to create an “iron wall [of bayonets] which the native population cannot break through”.

      This view of “peace” and what to do in its absence has been the mainstay of Israel policy since 1948. The claim that the Zionist state had no partner for peace became further entrenched in the Zionist narrative in the wake of the failed Camp David Summit in 2000. At the time, Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak claimed that Israel had made a “generous” and “unprecedented” offer that had been rejected by Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat.

      However in a wide-ranging 2003 interview in Israel’s largest circulating Hebrew newspaper, Yediot Aharonot, Barak admitted that the so-called “generous” offer was a lie. “I did not give away a thing”, he boasted.

      Major concessions
      This was reaffirmed in 2011, when some 1,700 documents relating to the “peace process” between 1999 and 2010 were leaked. The documents, belonging to the office of the chief Palestinian negotiator, Sa’eb Erekat, revealed that the Palestinian Authority (PA) and Palestine Liberation Organisation (PLO) had been willing to make extensive demographic and territorial concessions to Israel.

      Not only had PA/PLO negotiators been willing to accept the annexation of all but one of Israel’s illegal colonies in occupied Jerusalem, they were also prepared to allow the annexation of parts of Palestinian neighbourhoods in occupied East Jerusalem.

      The Palestine Papers also revealed that the Palestinian negotiators were prepared to allow “flexibility” in regard to Haram al-Sharif (the third holiest Muslim site in the world) and had been willing to negotiate away the right of return for the majority of the 6 million Palestinian refugees living in exile, while also acceding to Zionist demands that Israel be explicitly recognised as a Jewish state.

      When these revelations became public, the PLO and the PA were widely condemned by Palestinians. However, the Palestine Papers also revealed Israel’s rejectionism. Even when the Palestinian negotiators were prepared to give what Erakat termed “the biggest Yerushalayim [Jerusalem] in history” and to accede to the majority of Israel’s demands, including surrendering Palestinian rights enshrined in international law, it had not been enough for the leaders of the Zionist state.

      Despite these unprecedented concessions, Israel would agree to “peace” with the Palestinians only if they capitulated to every Israeli demand, accepted all Zionists goals and foreswore the establishment of a viable Palestinian state.

      Illegal construction continues
      The lack of an Israeli peace partner was again amply highlighted during Kerry’s recent visit, when Israel announced it would build 5,000 new Jewish only residences in occupied East Jerusalem and 20,000 new Jewish only residences in illegal colonies in the occupied West Bank.

      In a 7 November interview with Israel’s Channel 2, Kerry was forced to admonish Netanyahu: “How – if you say you’re working for peace and you want peace and a Palestine … that belongs to the people who live there – how can you say ‘We’re planning to build in the place that will eventually be Palestine?’ … it sends a message that somehow perhaps you’re not really serious.”

      Israel’s lip-service to the peace process should come as no surprise. Today, more than half a million Israeli settlers reside illegally in the West Bank and occupied East Jerusalem – double the figure of 241,500 prior to the Oslo agreement in 1993.

      While Israel continues its widespread colonisation in occupied East Jerusalem and the occupied West Bank, it has also announced plans to ethnically cleanse more than 40,000 Palestinian Bedouins, who are Israeli citizens, from more than 40 villages in the Negev desert in southern Israel.

      Gaza under siege
      Israel’s actions in Gaza over the last seven years have also revealed that it has little interest in ending the conflict with the Palestinians. Since 2006, Israel has imposed a brutal blockade on the 1.6 million people living in Gaza. The coastal strip was transformed into the world’s largest open air prison. This siege is illegal; collectively punishing a civilian population is a war crime under international law.

      According to the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, Israel’s blockade has now resulted in 44 percent of Gaza’s population (more than 700,000 people) suffering from food insecurity, while 80 percent (just under 1.3 million people) are dependent on donor aid.
      This month, Gaza’s Ministry of Health warned that the territory was on the brink of a “health catastrophe”. Not only is there a severe shortage of vital medicines; there is also a fuel shortage that threatens the 13 hospitals and 54 primary health care centres in the Gaza Strip. Since 2006, when Israeli bombing destroyed much of Gaza’s public infrastructure, including the only electricity plant, Gaza’s population, hospitals and essential services have been subject to frequent and lengthy power cuts.

      Palestinian hospitals and other essential services have been forced to rely on emergency generators to power life-saving equipment, as well as intensive care units and neonatal units. The fuel shortage also impacts greatly on the ability to dispatch emergency outreach services and ambulances to those in need.

      From its inception, the so-called “peace process” was doomed to failure because the Zionist state is not interested in reaching even a limited peace settlement with the Palestinians, let alone a just one. Israel’s actions over the last 20 years have confirmed that it plans to continue its apartheid and occupation policies, as well as ethnic cleansing of the Palestinian people.

      It is because Israel has demonstrated that it has no interest in peace that Palestinian civil society in 2005 launched the boycott, divestment and sanctions campaign, calling on all people of conscience to support the non-violent campaign until Israel meets its obligation to recognise the Palestinian people’s inalienable right to self-determination and fully complies with international law.

      Thursday, November 21, 2013

      Amira Hass: In the real tally of violence, Palestinians have it much worse

      Dear friends, 
      please find below veteran Israeli report, Amira Hass's lastest article which looks at the balance of violence between Palestinians and Israeli.

      The article is behind the paywall on Haaretz, so I have posted it here in full.

      in solidarity,
      Kim
      **

      In the real tally of violence, Palestinians have it much worse

      There is no Palestinian without a personal and familial history of injustice that was caused by, and is still caused by Israel.

      By | Nov. 21, 2013 | Haaretz





      Gaza parade.
      Palestinians gather around Hamas militants as they take part in a military parade marking the first anniversary of the eight-day conflict with Israel, in Gaza City November 14, 2013. Photo by Reuters


      Anyone who has worn a uniform past or in present, whether speaking on the record or off, immediately “knows” that the latest terror attack and what looks to soldiers as the latest attempted terror attack does not signify the beginning of a third Intifada. Or, they "know" it does signify such a beginning, and it's all because of the peace negotiations or because of Palestinian incitement, or both. Relying on the knowledgeable military brass is a fixed Israeli reflex; it is part of the balance of power and part of how the Israelis exert control over their subjects. 

      Whoever said 100,000 Palestinians have unfinished business with the Israel Defense Forces took it a step further creating the impression that he really knows and thinks, and does more than calculate tallies. But the starting point for calculation is somewhere else completely: There is no Palestinian whose score with the State of Israel is settled - whether he lives in forced exile or whether he lives within the borders of Israel, or in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. There is no Palestinian without a personal and familial history of injustice that was caused by, and is still caused by Israel. Just because the Israeli media does not report on all the injustices Israel causes day in and day out - even if only because they so numerous - does not mean they go away and neither does the anger they cause. Therefore, according to the correct calculation, the number of attacks by Palestinian individuals is relatively microscopic. This small number shows that for the vast majority of Palestinians - passing, murderous and hopeless revenge is not an option. 

      But nonetheless, the fatal attacks in recent months are worrying. They point at the political and social bankruptcy of the Palestinian leadership and organizations, who have stopped serving as the national rallying point, and are unable to hold back the waves of despair. The Palestinian feels isolated against his attackers. New initiatives and other forms of leadership are still in their diapers. And in the meantime, the Israel's methods of injustice are becoming more sophisticated. To speak about the anger without linking it to the occupation and systematic discrimination is like discussing environmental pollution without reference to the polluter. 

      Any Jew in the world who has never so much as set foot here, automatically enjoys the right to enter Israel, to find shelter here from economic distress (Argentina) or political distress (Russia), to tour the land, to settle down, to live and to work on both sides of the Green Line. These are rights that are partially or fully denied to Palestinians - whether they are citizens of the state or not, whether they live in Israel, whether their family comes from here and whether they lost land and property to the other. 

      What kind of feelings does the structural discrimination against Palestinians engender? It riles up and infuriates. The Israeli experts, those who keep stats on Palestinian violence, either ignore their own violence or else they are smart enough to cover it up. We must therefore cry out again and again: Every Palestinian, man or woman, poor and less poor, and also the very wealthy, refugees or not, and those who live in the Land of Israel (within the borders of the British Mandate) daily risk that the Israeli authorities and their representatives (soldiers, policemen, settlers, right-wingers) will harm them in some fashion. The situation jeopardizes their lives, livelihood, property, land, health, education, or the continuity of their family and social relations. 

      In every area, there are additional varieties of harm and harassment particular to it. For citizens of Israel, it is the creeping racist legislation. In East Jerusalem, it is the negation of residency status and expulsion from Israel. In the West Bank, it is the wholesale arrests, the settlements, the settlers, land expropriations under a pseudo-legal guise, and lack of running water in many communities during the summer. And in the Gaza Strip? Unseen jailers, whose identity is known. They sequester its residents in the world’s largest prison camp, and there is no one who will say as God said to Moses during the crossing of the Red Sea: Wake up, compose thyself, my beloved ones are drowning in the sewage and in the sea of oblivion.